NASA's acting administrator Sean Duffy's rebuttal to reality star Kim Kardashian's remarks that the 1969 Moon landing was fake faced flak on social media, as several users urged Duffy to focus on space expeditions instead. Kardashian made the comments on the latest episode of her TV series The
Interview: Recognition for Palestine state harms the rights of stateless Palestinians
Australia, Britain, Canada and France became the latest Western nations to recognise a Palestinian state last month, but the backing has cost Palestinians rights in other countries since they are no longer considered stateless, a legal expert said.
Patrícia Cabral, legal policy coordinator at the European Network on Statelessness, a civil society alliance, cited the examples of Bulgaria, Hungary and Norway, where Palestinians had seen their rights curtailed after statehood recognition.
Recognising a Palestinian state aims to pressure Israel to end its two-year assault on Gaza, which has killed more than 66,000 people, displaced 1.9 million and led to famine.
A UN Commission of Inquiry concluded in September that Israel had committed genocide in the narrow 40 km strip of land, an assessment rejected by Israel.
US President Donald Trump this week outlined a peace plan with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to end the war, giving Palestinian militant group Hamas days to respond.
Cabral spoke to Context about the rights Palestinians should be afforded and the effect of recent political declarations.
Most Palestinians, who don't hold another nationality, should be considered stateless under international law. And that's because Palestine does not have a nationality law.
It doesn't have sovereign control over its borders, it doesn't have the ability to issue identity and travel documents without depending on Israel for that as well.
All of these are core elements of statehood.
Palestinians should be entitled to protection as refugees under the Refugee Convention, but then also as stateless persons under the 1954 Statelessness Convention.
Stateless Palestinians, as other stateless people, should be granted residency rights and access to economic and social rights, and also access to a facilitated route to naturalisation, for example, with reduced residency requirements, precisely because they are stateless and so they shouldn't be kept in limbo for a long time.
States also have safeguards to make sure children are not born stateless in their territory, which should also apply to Palestinian children who don't have another nationality.
Even if Palestine is recognised as a state by other countries, that is essentially a political statement. It's an act of political expression and it doesn't have legal implications.
But in some countries, the fact that the state recognises Palestine has meant that there's a change in administrative practice or there's a change in government policy, and suddenly Palestinians are considered to have a nationality instead of being considered stateless.
We've seen, for example, in Bulgaria and Hungary, many Palestinians are denied protection because their governments recognise Palestine as a state. And so they're left without any routes of protection many times, or their applications for protection are automatically rejected.
Yes, we are concerned with that. We have seen that happening in Norway, for example.
Norway recognised Palestine as a state last year and because of that, there's been a change in government policy that says because of this recognition, Palestinians should not be considered stateless.
So they would have to comply with an eight-year residency requirement to access Norwegian nationality instead of the usual three years that they were accessing before. And there's been a lot of backlash against this.
Because we have seen this happening in Norway, we're concerned that this may happen in other countries.
There's a lot of work that can be done in terms of raising awareness, training authorities, decision-makers and the judiciary to address this.
That's why we have put out a legal briefing (on protecting the rights of stateless Palestinians) so that legal practitioners are aware of this and are equipped with arguments that they can use in their own cases.
Definitely the courts have a role here as well.
This article first appeared on Context, powered by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.
Source: Scroll
Related Posts: Why $10M US-Funded Contraceptives Are Burned In France As Poor Nations Plead University Of Western Australia To Open Mumbai Why Ultra-Rich Businessmen Are Leaving Britain Canoeing-Britain's Clarke wins fourth successive kayak cross world title Has Britain's budget watchdog become too all-powerful Britain's Daily Mail publisher enters exclusive talks to buy Telegraph Media Group for USD 654 million How US megastar Luke Combs helped Britain fall in love with country music Trump slams energy deal between California and Britain Britain issues first online safety fine to US website 4chan Britain's Kavanagh stuns ex-champion Moreno with three weeks
NASA's acting administrator Sean Duffy's rebuttal to reality star Kim Kardashian's remarks that the 1969 Moon landing was fake faced flak on social media, as several users urged Duffy to focus on space expeditions instead. Kardashian made the comments on the latest episode of her TV series The
4 months ago
