The Supreme Court will hear Naresh Balyan's plea challenging his bail denial. The Delhi High Court previously rejected his bail application in a MCOCA case. Balyan is accused of facilitating a crime syndicate run by gangster Kapil Sangwan. The high court found an active criminal nexus between
The Delhi High Court has sought responses from Abhijit Iyer Mitra and others. A Cockroach Janta Party spokesperson filed a plea alleging privacy violations. The court issued notices and summons regarding the disclosure of residential details. X, formerly Twitter
A Supreme Court Bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta has banned any construction or development within 100 metres of Jojari River in Rajasthan,hearing a suo motu case on Monday (August 24, 2026). The court also prohibited hazardous industries within 500 metres of the river’s flow path
The Congress party criticises the Modi government's aggressive privatisation agenda for India's space program. They question the rationale behind weakening ISRO's capabilities and transferring its assets. Reports indicate ISRO's role in rocket development will be severely limited by this new policy
Chlorine gas leak at a water treatment plant in Nagpur shortly after midnight on Monday (August 24, 2026) sent nearby residents running for safety and left many people gasping for breath, officials said. Several people were hospitalised after the leakage occurred in a 900-kg capacity chlorine gas
Three reasons why West Bengal’s SIR exercise was unconstitutional
The political consequences of the Election Commission of India’s controversial voter-roll revision came into sharp focus on May 4, when the Bharatiya Janata Party swept to power in West Bengal with 207 seats.
In a state where 1.36 crore voters were reportedly flagged by the commission as having a “logical discrepancy” and at least 27 lakh people have appealed against their names being deleted from the rolls, the Trinamool Congress’s defeat by the BJP will inevitably subject the commission’s actions to searching scrutiny.
On the face of it, however, it would seem that the Special Intensive Revision of the electoral rolls conducted in West Bengal was unconstitutional for three reasons.
First, the Election Commission created a new category of electoral suspicion – “logical discrepancies” – without statutory authority. Second, it delegated voter-eligibility decisions to officials exercising quasi-judicial power without adequate training, standards, or procedural clarity. Third, it created an appeals process that could not realistically correct wrongful exclusions before polling.
Whether wittingly or not, the Supreme Court has ensured that administrative delay results in mass disenfranchisement.
The Supreme Court should therefore have stayed exclusions, based on the “logical discrepancy” category in the case of Mostari Banu v Election Commission of India, and required the commission to disclose the criteria on which it made these decisions, keeping already-registered voters on the rolls pending meaningful appeal. Instead, it rendered these defects provisionally legal and permitted the electorate itself to be shaped by opaque administrative processes.
Courts are often reluctant to intervene in these electoral processes. Their reason for doing so rests on the issue appearing political, even though non-intervention changes the political baseline. The Special Intensive Revision litigation belongs in that frame. When access to the democratic process is threatened, the judiciary’s role is to protect the preconditions of equal political participation.
1. The EC does not have the power to create a new category of “logical discrepancies”
The Election Commission’s first constitutional infirmity was the invention of a new category of electoral suspicion: “logical discrepancies”. It reportedly covered mismatches in a father’s name, variations in parents’ ages, large age gaps between parents, and irregularities in grandparents’ ages.
But no provision of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, the Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961, or the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960 creates such a category.
It does not authorise the commission to build algorithmic proxies (the workings of which have not been made public) for ineligibility, and then require lakhs of voters to rebut them.
Categories are instruments of power. Once the state labels a registered voter as having a “logical discrepancy” in their entry on the rolls, that person is no longer treated as an ordinary elector. They become administratively suspect.
In West Bengal, alongside cases that the commission treated as suspicious, the category appears to have swept in ordinary clerical variations – spelling errors, missing middle names, age inconsistencies, and data-entry mistakes.
The commission’s response to these concerns was to invoke Article 324, which gives it broad control over elections. But that power is not a blank check. In the 1984 case of AC Jose v Sivan Pillai, the Supreme Court held that when election law already covers the field, the commission cannot rewrite or add to it through administrative directions.
In the 1995 case of Lal Babu Hussein, the court made clear that voter-roll preparation is governed not only by election statutes, but also by the Constitution’s basic voting guarantees: no identity-based exclusion from the rolls and the right to vote of adult citizens.
The oral hearings at the Supreme Court in the SIR case exposed the unsteady footing of the commission’s position. Justice Joymalya Bagchi reportedly noted that Bihar’s SIR had no comparable list of logical discrepancies. However, in West Bengal, it became central to the Election Commission’s goals.
A category absent from statute, absent from prior practice, and justified only during litigation is hardly a minor administrative detail. It is much closer to lawmaking, which only the Parliament is empowered to do.
2. Delegating quasi-judicial power without adequate safeguards
The second issue concerned who was deciding voter eligibility. Indian administrative law has long treated such rights-affecting decisions as quasi-judicial, meaning officials must act with court-like fairness, even if they are not judges.
In 1969, the Supreme Court in the case of AK Kraipak v Union of India, rejected the rigid divide between administrative and quasi-judicial power because administrative decisions may carry consequences as serious as judicial ones.
The SIR process sits uneasily with that principle. Petitioners argued that many officials deciding voter eligibility lacked legal training and came from unrelated administrative roles.
But when pressed on this, Senior Advocate DS Naidu, appearing for the Election Commission, reportedly said some officers had been chosen because they were at the same pay level as the required officials – “engineers, etc.” – even though they were being asked to make legal decisions about who could remain on the voter roll.
There were also allegations that instructions were sent through informal channels, including WhatsApp messages and oral directions. Petitioners further claimed that Election Commission-appointed “special roll observers” – senior supervisory officials brought in to monitor the revision process – were able to influence or override Electoral Registration Officers through procedures that were never publicly disclosed.
If true, this was not merely poor administration, but the exercise of power that affected citizens’ rights through unclear authority and opaque standards.
The court’s response was practical, but incomplete. It asked judicial officers from the Calcutta High Court to help handle claims arising from the “logical discrepancy” list, which may have reduced the immediate backlog. But it did not answer the harder question: was the original process lawful if voter eligibility was being decided by officials without proper legal training, clear rules, or real independence?
By patching the process rather than testing its foundations, the court legitimised a potentially unlawful structure through supervision.
3. The appeals process would never finish on time for polls
The third failure was remedial. The appeals process was structurally incapable of correcting wrongful exclusions before they became actual disenfranchisement. Reports before the court indicated that over 34 lakh appeals were pending, with polling close at hand. The court refused to let pending appellants vote, reasoning that elections must proceed on finalised rolls.
There’s a reason courts hesitate to change election rules close to polling. In the US, the Purcell principle in election law captures this concern: late judicial changes can confuse voters, unduly burden administrators and destabilise elections.
The analogous concern here cuts the other way: the state should not be allowed to disrupt that baseline through a rushed exclusion process and then invoke finality as a shield. The court placed the risk of institutional delay on voters rather than on the state. A wrongly flagged voter could be excluded not because they were ineligible, but because their appeal was not heard in time.
Once a person is already on the voter rolls, the state should bear the burden before removal. The court’s own decision in the Lal Babu Hussein case makes that point: that the preparation and revision of electoral rolls must adhere to the principles of fairness and natural justice, and before any deletion of a voter’s name, authorities must present clear evidence and afford the individual a reasonable opportunity to contest
The injury, then, was not only wrongful removal. It was that exclusion became easy and restoration difficult. A sound anti-Purcell principle would run the other way: courts should hesitate to disturb elections, but they should be even more hesitant to permit the state to change the electorate before meaningful review is possible.
The court could have stayed exclusions based on “logical discrepancies” until the Election Commission disclosed the category’s statutory basis, the criteria used to generate the flags, and the reasons for each exclusion.
It also could have treated existing voters as eligible unless and until a fair process proved otherwise. That approach would have fit the Constitution’s promise of adult voting rights, its ban on identity-based exclusion from voter rolls, and the Court’s own earlier election cases discussed earlier.
Instead, the court placed the risk of institutional delay on the voter. Chief Justice Surya Kant reportedly rejected voting by those with pending appeals as “entirely out of the question”. The court later allowed successful appeals to be reflected in supplementary rolls, but made clear that mere pendency of an appeal would not preserve the applicant’s vote.
In doing so, the court burdened the right-bearing voter with the cost of administrative failure rather than the state machinery that produced it. That is a remarkable inversion. It is especially troubling in voting-rights cases, where courts are meant to correct the vast power imbalance between citizen and state – not deepen it.
The post-election litigation now shows the cost of that choice. The Trinamool Congress has argued in the Supreme Court that, in 31 West Bengal constituencies won by the BJP, the margin of victory was smaller than the number of voters deleted through the SIR process whose appeals remained pending. It also reportedly argued that the statewide vote gap was about 32 lakh, while nearly 35 lakh deletion appeals were still pending.
The Court has asked Trinamool to file separate applications on this claim, while the Election Commission argues that challenges to election results must proceed through election petitions. That is the trap. Before the election, relief was treated as premature or disruptive. After the election, the injury is broken into constituency-by-constituency litigation, harder to consolidate and harder still to remedy without appearing to undo the voters’ verdict.
West Bengal’s special intensive revision should therefore be understood as a constitutional failure, not merely an electoral controversy. It shows how disenfranchisement can occur without an express voting ban, emergency rule, or formal amendment to election law.
In a constitutional democracy, courts must not merely keep elections moving. They must keep the electorate open.
Gaurav Mukherjee is an Associate Professor at the College of Law at Syracuse University.
Source: Scroll
Related Posts: Politics, west bengal sir, west bengal sir supreme court, logical discrepancies in west bengal sir, logical discrepancy list west bengal, logical discrepancy in sir
West Bengal Chief Minister Suvendu Adhikari on Sunday said Bengal must emerge as a major investment destination as he highlighted the state's cooperation with the Centre in defence, infrastructure and industrial development. His remarks came as Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and Adhikari virtually
11 hours ago
BJP national general secretary Smriti Irani said Prime Minister Narendra Modi has remained responsive to youth concerns and shown that political differences can be set aside to improve government systems. BJP national general secretary Smriti Irani said the Prime Minister has been attentive to the
14 hours ago
In April 2025, the Modi government made a dramatic U-turn and announced that it would count caste in India’s next census. At the time, it made sure to take potshots at its predecessor, the Manmohan Singh-led United Progressive Alliance government, for not including caste in the 2011 census
14 hours ago
Uttar Pradesh Assembly Speaker Satish Mahana has sparked outrage after footage emerged of him leaving the dais during the National Anthem. Opposition leaders have called for his apology, questioning his respect for national sentiments. In his defense
14 hours ago
The upkeep of Delhi's iconic Lutyens bungalows, now nearly a century old, is becoming increasingly expensive - annual expenditure on the renovation, furnishing and repair of the official residences of Union Ministers touched a record high of ₹92.35 crore in 2025-26
1 days ago
Industrialist Gautam Adani met Karnataka Chief Minister D K Shivakumar for an hour. Sources described the meeting as a courtesy visit while returning to the airport. The meeting occurred amid a proposed tunnel road project for which Adani Enterprises is the lowest bidder
1 days ago
Rohtak MP Deepender Hooda has clarified his statements regarding Sajjan Kumar's death, denying he ever referred to the former MP as a role model. He underscored his family's long-standing opposition to the 1984 anti-Sikh riots, firmly reiterating their commitment to advocating for the rights and
1 days ago
A project in Assam to improve the quality of an elephant habitat could turn a botanical liability into a carbon-rich asset. For decades, Assam Forest Department officials have struggled to deal with at least half a dozen invasive alien plants (IAPs) that have been constricting local vegetation and
1 days ago
At a Cabinet meeting on Wednesday, Union ministers were handed report cards. They were not being assessed for their performance as ministers but on how active and effective they have been on social media. Each minister was ranked based on an evaluation of their social media presence between May 1
1 days ago
The Indian Overseas Congress USA Telangana Chapter voiced disappointment over denied political clearance for Chief Minister Revanth Reddy's US trip. The Ministry of External Affairs cited the program's inappropriateness for the office held by the Chief Minister
1 days ago
Expressing her firm stance, Mayawati, the BSP chief, has rejected the idea of substituting caste-based reservations with economic ones, arguing that it would harm the broader national interest. She pointed to constitutional protections for historically marginalized groups and condemned Congress
1 days ago
Rahul Gandhi's 'Chhatro Ki Goonj' program focused on young women in Pune. Congress leaders stated the program's message reached Delhi, causing visible panic. Supriya Shrinate highlighted the platform provided for women to voice their concerns. Union Minister Murlidhar Mohol criticized the program
1 days ago
Prime Minister Modi met the BJP's new national office-bearers, stressing public connection and organizational strength. The party announced a nationwide 'Seva Sankalp Abhiyan' from September 17 to October 17. This campaign aims to spread the spirit of service associated with Modi's public life
1 days ago
Sikh leaders protested outside Rahul Gandhi's residence on Saturday. They demanded an apology for Congress leaders' remarks about Sajjan Kumar. Sajjan Kumar, convicted in the 1984 riots, recently passed away. Protesters stated that such statements reopened old wounds for families
2 days ago
The Bharatiya Janata Party passed a resolution defending Vande Mataram's national status. This action strongly condemned the Congress Working Committee's recent decision regarding the song. The BJP affirmed the constitutional and statutory protection of the complete National Song
2 days ago
BJP national president Nitin Nabin on Saturday (August 22, 2026) held the first meeting with the party's newly appointed national office-bearers to discuss poll strategy and grassroots outreach, party sources said. The meeting focused on preparations for upcoming State Assembly elections
2 days ago
Two workers were killed and 11 others were injured in a reactor blast in a pharmaceutical firm in Dothigudem in Pochampally in Yadadri district late on Friday (August 21, 2026) night. The factory is about 50 km from Hyderabad. According to police officials
2 days ago
The Supreme Court has redefined the term 'industry' for new labor cases. This ruling will not affect past or pending cases under the old law. The Congress party expressed concern over this significant change. They believe it weakens essential safeguards for many workers
2 days ago
BJP MP Dharmendra Pradhan accused Congress of appeasement politics regarding the Vande Mataram song. He stated the party's true face has been exposed to the nation. West Bengal Congress President Subhankar Sarkar rejected these allegations from the BJP
2 days ago
Claiming that “rule of law” prevails in Bengal now with the new BJP government in power, Shah said the previous government did not implement BNS in Bengal so that they could promote cut money, syndicate raj and corruption. He praised CM Suvendu Adhikari who has fulfilled 43% of the poll
2 days ago
Prime Minister Narendra Modi pledged faster reforms and greater ease of living. He expressed confidence that a stable India will contribute to world stability. India has been an oasis of political stability amidst global fluctuations. The government is committed to uplifting the youth, farmers
2 days ago
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister C Joseph Vijay on Thursday asked the Union government to provide a legislative assurance that any state’s representation in Parliament will not reduce due to the delimitation exercise, The New Indian Express reported
2 days ago
Welcome to The India Fix by Shoaib Daniyal. A newsletter on Indian politics. As always, if you’ve been sent this newsletter and like it, to get it in your inbox every week, sign up here (click on “follow”). “I was never involved in corruption
2 days ago
A Congress delegation petitioned the Election Commission regarding voter list irregularities. They alleged eligible voters' names were struck off electoral rolls. People were declared absent and young individuals marked deceased without cause. Notices were not reaching recipients
3 days ago
Karnataka's Chief Minister DK Shivakumar urged the Southern Zonal Council to retain the 1971 census for delimitation. He also requested maintaining the Lok Sabha's strength at 543 for the next twenty-five years. Shivakumar sought to accommodate women's quota within the existing strength without
3 days ago
Farmers in Karnataka's Cauvery basin intensified protests on Thursday, opposing water release to Tamil Nadu. The Cauvery Water Management Authority ordered Karnataka to release water, which Tamil Nadu seeks to enforce. Protesters questioned the decision
4 days ago
Journalist Tarun Tejpal, former editor of Tehelka magazine, on Thursday (August 20, 2026) appealed in the Supreme Court against the August 6, 2026, judgment of the Bombay High Court sentencing him to 10 years imprisonment in a 2013 rape case. His appeal comes as the State of Goa
4 days ago
